Hello,
I would like to understand what exactly makes it so difficult to make the code generated by Prototype as solid and well-structured as the one produced by Gemini Studio.
It’s honestly absurd how Gemini Studio can generate high-quality, visually coherent prototypes, while Prototype — part of the very same ecosystem — produces messy layouts with no visual intelligence whatsoever, unable to even handle simple concepts like parallax, container dividers, or visual hierarchy.
It’s unbelievable how amateurish the Prototype feels when dealing with basic visual requests, whereas Gemini Studio delivers the exact same prompt with clean, professional-grade results.
Below, I’m including examples that clearly show this contrast.
I’d like to receive a technical and objective explanation for this discrepancy. And if the answer involves the use of MCP, then please specify which MCP Gemini Studio actually uses, because it makes absolutely no sense to charge 200 USDT for a so-called “PRO” plan that offers nothing truly professional — just extra AI credits, with no improvement in quality whatsoever.